Answer the following questions in a simple , direct manner. State the relevant rule/principle and apply to the scenario given. Rule 1 mark, Apply 1 mark. Example:Nasir agrees to sell his motorcycle worth RM 20,000 to Faizul for only RM 10. Nasir's consent to the sale was freely given. Is the contract between Nasir and Faizul valid? Explain. Rule: Consideration must be given but need not be adequate Apply: As long as Nasir's consent is given freely, does not matter that Faizul pays only RM10 for a 20k motor as consideration need not match the value. Thus their contract is valid.

3. Jack and Jill are negotiating a sale of land. Jack the owner, did not tell Jill anything about the land's condition . If Jill later discovers that the land is not fertile and she can hardly grow anything, can she sue Jack for misrepresentation?

(2 Points)

8. A buyer made an order for 200 cans of sardines under the brand 'Red Eagles' at the price of RM4.00 per can. He told the seller to pack the cans into 10 cartons of 20 cans each. The seller send the 200 cans but in 20 cartons of 10 cans each . Can the buyer refuse to accept the sardines under Sale of Goods Act?

(2 Points)