Any help with the bottom two questions would be greatly appreciated :)

International Marketing Incident: Moving Production Overseas After analyzing relative production, distribution, and tariff costs, AllStar decides to build a plant in Peru where costs are significantly lower than in the home U.S. plant (e.g., 20% lower to produce a small economy tube of toothpaste). Previously 200 million units for Latin America had been produced at the manufacturing facility in the U.S. (home plant). However, after the Peru plant is completed, AllStar begins supplying all of Latin America from the local plant. As such, the 200 million units no longer need to be produced at the U.S. plant. As a result of moving Latin America-bound production overseas, AllStar has too much excess capacity in the U.S. and decides to close a manufacturing facility in U.S. While you new employee hundreds of manufacturing workers in Peru, you have laid off roughly the same amount in U.S. As we have discussed in class, moving production from the U.S. to other countries for productivity and cost reasons has been shown to benefit U.S. companies and even have an overall positive effect on the U.S. economy (review chapter 2 for a refresher). That said, in an era of growing nationalism, this is unlikely to be a simple financial decision. Taking into account potentially political issues, what advice would you give Allstar on how to deal with the move? In building your answer, please address the following issues: 0 What are some of the possible unintended consequences of such a move? Do U.S. companies have a social responsibility to produce in the U.S.? Would acting in a more socially responsible way necessarily benefit the company financially