Appendix 1: Written Assignment 1: Comprehensive Mental Health Assessment
Criteria	Ratings	Points
Criterion 1: Assessment of person view longer description	12 to >10.08 pts High Distinction Outstanding and comprehensive Assessment including the person's mental and physical health, and psychosocial health. Includes the process of engagement and a recovery focused exploration of vulnerabilities and strengths. 10.08 to >8.88 pts Distinction Excellent detailed assessment including the person's mental and physical health, and psychosocial health. Includes the process of engagement and a recovery focused exploration of vulnerabilities and strengths 8.88 to >7.68 pts Credit Relevant and informed assessment including the person's mental and physical health, and psychosocial health. Includes the process of engagement and a recovery focused exploration of vulnerabilities and strengths. 7.68 to >5.88 pts Pass Satisfactory assessment including person's mental and physical health, and psychosocial health. Satisfactory inclusion of the process of engagement and a recovery focused exploration of vulnerabilities and strengths. 5.88 to >0 pts Fail Inadequate assessment fails to address all aspects the person: mental and physical health, and of psychosocial health. Inadequate inclusion of the process of engagement and a recovery focused exploration of vulnerabilities and strengths. 0 marks if not attempted	/ 12 pts
Criterion 2: Formulation of problems view longer description	12 to >10.08 pts High Distinction Outstanding and insightful formulation of the problems: including the symptoms of mental illness, the consumers perspective and the context of the admission to acute care. 10.08 to >8.88 pts Distinction Excellent contextual formulation of the problems: including the symptoms of mental illness, the consumers perspective and the context of the admission to acute care. 8.88 to >7.68 pts Credit Relevant and appropriately informed formulation of the problems: including the symptoms of mental illness, the consumers perspective and the context of the admission to acute care. 7.68 to >5.88 pts Pass Satisfactory formulation of the problems: includes the symptoms of mental illness, the consumers perspective and the context of the admission to acute care. 5.88 to >0 pts Fail Inadequate formulation of the problems. Fails to address all aspects required - symptoms of mental illness, the consumers perspective and the context of the admission to acute care. 0 marks if not attempted	/ 12 pts
Criterion 3: Expression and academic writing view longer description	3 to >2.52 pts High Distinction Exemplary writing with very high levels of authenticity and independent thought. Ideas and reasoning are clearly expressed. Introductory sentence used at the start of paragraphs. Main subject matter is developed within each paragraph. Concluding sentence used at the end of paragraphs. Exemplary spelling, grammar and syntax with no errors. Meets all style requirements. 2.52 to >2.22 pts Distinction Evidence of superior academic writing skills. Authentic and original writing that clearly synthesises the key points of the assignment. Expression of ideas and reasoning is clear. Correct use of paragraphs. Discussion in each paragraph provides sufficient depth to demonstrate understanding. Superior spelling, grammar and syntax < 5 minor errors. Meets all style requirements. 2.22 to >1.92 pts Credit Evidence of sound academic writing. Authentic and original writing that clearly addresses the key points of the assignment. Expression of ideas and reasoning is satisfactory. Paragraphs are 5-7 sentences in length and sentences are clear and concise. Minor errors only in syntax, spelling and grammar. Meets all style requirements. 1.92 to >1.47 pts Pass Authentic writing that attempts to show independent thought. May struggle with expression of ideas and reasoning. Attempts to use paragraphs. Some sentences may be too long/short. Meets almost all style requirements including spacing, page numbers, font, headings. 1.47 to >0 pts Fail Lacks authenticity. Language hinders the effective flow of ideas and meaning. Sentences lack structure and are consistently too short or too long. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar and style. Not structured as per requirements in Course Outline.	/ 3 pts
Criterion 4: Literature sources and referencing view longer description	3 to >2.52 pts High Distinction Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. Complies with all the referencing style requirements. There are no errors in referencing throughout. 2.52 to >2.22 pts Distinction Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. APA 7 referencing style is consistently accurate. Less than 5 minor referencing errors. 2.22 to >1.92 pts Credit Sources are appropriate, mostly contemporary and from a narrow range of journals and databases. Complies with referencing style requirements. Some referencing errors in in-text and/or referencing list (5-7). 1.92 to >1.47 pts Pass Sources are mostly relevant however there are too few to demonstrate wide reading. Attempts to use APA 7 style. Some errors in in-text and/or referencing list (8-10). 1.47 to >0 pts Fail Sources are inappropriate and/or absent. Reference list and intext referencing contains major errors (>10). 0 marks - Sources are absent. Absent in-text referencing and/or reference list. Word count 1500 times new roman , font 12, form of case study