Question
Architect, a cash basis TP, has been conducting a business as a sole proprietorship for several years. Architect decides to incorporate, and on July 1
Architect, a cash basis TP, has been conducting a business as a sole proprietorship for several years. Architect decides to incorporate, and on July 1 of the current year he forms Design, Inc., to which he transfers the following assets:
Assets AB FMV
Accounts Receivable $0 $60,000
Supplies 0 20,000
Unimproved Land 60,000 120,000
Total $60,000 $200,000
The land was subject to contingent environmental liabilities that Architect had not taken into account (i.e., had not deducted or capitalized) for tax purposes at the time of the incorporation. The supplies were acquired nine months ago and their cost was immediately deducted by Architect as an ordinary and necessary business expense.
In exchange, Architect receives 100 shares of Design common stock with a FMV of $100,000. In addition, Design assumes $70,000 of accounts payable to trade creditors of Architect's sole proprietorship and a $30,000 bank loan incurred by Architect two years ago for valid business reasons, and it assumed the environmental liabilities associated with the land.
Design elects to become a cash method, calendar year TaxPayer. During the remainder of the current year, it pays $30,000 of the accounts payable and collects $40,000 of the accounts receivable transferred by Architect. In the following taxable year, Design paid $20,000 in environmental remediation expenses that qualified for a current deduction when paid or accrued under Section 162.
(a)What are the tax consequences (gain or loss recognized, basis and holding period) of the incorporation to Architect and Design, Inc.?
(b) Who will be taxable upon collection of the accounts receivable: Architect, Design or both?
(c) When Design pays the accounts payable assumed from Architect and incurs the environmental remediation costs, may it properly deduct these expenses?
(d)Assume that Architect is in the highest marginal individual tax bracket and Design, Inc. anticipates no significant TI for the current year:
What result, if Architect decides to pay (and deduct) personally all the accounts payable. and transfers the accounts receivable to the C?
(e) Would your answers be any different if Architect had been an accrual method Taxpayer?
(f) Is Design, Inc. limited in its choice of accounting method (i.e., cash or accrual) or taxable year? See 441; 448
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started