Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Art and Betty own adjoining farms in rural Riverside County, an area, where all agriculture requires irrigation. Art bought a well-drilling rig and drilled a

Art and Betty own adjoining farms in rural Riverside County, an area, where all agriculture requires irrigation. Art bought a well-drilling rig and drilled a 400-foot well from which he drew drinking water. Betty needed no additional irrigation water, but in January 1985, she asked Art on what terms he would drill a well near her house to supply better tasting drinking water than the County water she has been using for years.

Art said that because he had never before drilled a well for hire, he would charge Betty only $10 per foot, about $1 more than his expected cost. Art said that he would drill to a maximum depth of 600 feet, which is the deepest his rig could reach. Betty said, "OK, if you guarantee June 1 completion." Art agreed and asked for $3500 in advance, with any additional further payment or refund to be made on completion. Betty said, " OK," and paid Art $3500.

Art started to drill on May 1. He had reached a depth of 200 feet on May 10 when his drill struck rock and broke, plugging the hole. The accident was unavoidable. It had cost Art $12 per foot to drill this 200 feet. Art said he would not charge Betty for drilling the useless hole, but he would have to start a new well close by, and could not promise its completion before July 1.

Betty, annoyed by Art's failure, refused to let Art start another well and on June 1, she contracted with Carlos to drill a well. Carlos agreed to drill to a maximum depth of 350 feet for $4500, which Betty also paid in advance, but Carlos could not start drilling until October 1. He completed drilling and struck water at 300 feet on October 30.

In July, Betty sued Art seeking to recover her $3500, plus the $4500 paid to Carlos.

Discuss:

1.Was a contract between Betty and Art formed?If so discuss the offer, acceptance, and consideration

2.Performance - Was the contract properly performed.Are there any prevention to performance issues ie. was Art unable to perform and why.Is it a good enough excuse for Art to back out of the contract?

3.What are the defenses available to Art.What damages is Betty entitled to, if any.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Contract Law

Authors: Ewan McKendrick

13th Edition

1352005255, 978-1352005257

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

= the companys cash position?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

1. Background knowledge of the subject and

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2. The purpose of the acquisition of the information.

Answered: 1 week ago