As a data scientist in a data warehouse, you have been working with a set of records that was scraped from social media. These records include name, screen name, email address, geographic location, IP $($Internet Protocol$)$ address, demographic profiles, and preferences of relationships for different users. If you have received permission from your managers to post this data in a public space, why still might it be unethical to post a de$-$identified form of the dataset where the name and email addresses were removed? Please explain the ethical concerns relevant to this action.

Choose the ethical reasons for not posting a de$-$identified form of the dataset on the public online platforms $($You may choose more than one answer$)$:

Group of answer choices

Even if managers have given permission to post the data, it is important to consider whether the individuals in the dataset gave their consent for their information to be shared in a public platforms.

We need to explore the relationships between the variables of this data before posting it on public spaces.

We need to consult with the experts about this data.

Posting the data could potentially cause harm to individuals in the dataset.

Posting the data could undermine trust in the data warehouse and the organization as a whole.

Even if the name and email addresses are removed, it may still be possible to re$-$identify individuals in the dataset by combining different pieces of information.

Even if re$-$identification is not possible, individuals in the dataset still have a right to privacy.