As a Deloitte partner you have been appointed to review the performance of the fu'm's work on the SKS project. On review of the facts, you note: (1) SKS was sustaining financial losses, (2) SKS was having challenges paying suppliers, (3) SKS was experiencing inventory increases, (4) SKS was experiencing cash ow problems, (5) At month-end, SKS sales would present manufacturing with many order changes, and (6) SKS relied on two systems, one automated (MR?) and the other manual. Based on the fact pattern, what would have been the most reasonable approach for the Deloitte team to use? 0 A. The Deloitte team should have used a deductive approach to review inventory levels, BOMs, and workinprocess. O B. The Deloitte team should have used an deductive approach to identify variances between marketing plans, manufacturing plans, actual sales, actual manufacturing, and changes in inventory levels 0 C. The Deloitte team should have used an abductive approach to identify variances between marketing plans, manufacturing plans, actual sales, actual manufacturing, and changes in inventory levels. O D. The Deloit'te team should have used an inductive approach to identify variances between marketing plans, manufacturing plans, actual sales, actual manufacturing, and changes in inventory levels