Question
As an economics analyst for your firm (Firm 1), you are considering whether your firm should sell plain or wholemeal bread. You have to contend
As an economics analyst for your firm (Firm 1), you are considering whether your firm should sell plain or wholemeal bread. You have to contend with a rival firm (Firm 2), who are also making similar plans. The decision will be made simultaneously and both firms are aware of the pay-offs (profits, in millions of dollars), shown in the table below.
Firm 2 | |||
Plain | Wholemeal | ||
Firm 1 | Plain | 2, 3 | 5, 7 |
Wholemeal | 5, 2 | -2, 3 |
- In your research you need to demonstrate the optimal strategy, given the strategy of the rival firm, to your CEO, who is not trained in economics. To do so, you need to demonstrate the Nash equilibrium, and how you derived it. Also clearly state the profits each firm will make in the Nash equilibrium.
- As a conservative analyst, you also consider the maximin outcome in case the management of Firm 2 behaves irrationally. Indeed, the management of Firm 2 does the same analysis in case the management of your firm (Firm 1) also behaves irrationally. Demonstrate the maximin strategy outcome, and explain your answer
You have explained the Stackelberg Model and the first mover advantage to your CEO, who now thinks it is a good idea to make the first move, and make greater profits than that found in part (a). Using a decision tree to explain your answer, tell us why your CEO is correct or wrong.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started