As part of your reading in Chapter 16 you read the case of Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz. Notwithstanding the law as applied, do you believe an employer should be able to change the terms of pension plan qualifications once individuals have begun to avail themselves of the benefits? Can you think of any circumstances where you might be persuaded that the employer should be able to modify the plan in this regard? The court does not seem to be persuaded at all by the Plan's arguments, though the District Court found in its favor. Are you persuaded by any of the Plan's arguments?