As Philippa Foot makes clear, there are actually several different types of euthanasiaeach type will be labeled according to whether the euthanasia is active or passive (roughly, the distinction between killing and letting die) and whether the euthanasia is voluntary (the person wants to die), non- voluntary (the person is unable to express a wish one way or another), or involuntary (the person wants to live). (a) Offer Philippa Foot's argument for the moral permissibility or impermissibility of cases of active voluntary euthanasia, appealing to each of the two virtues you described above. In other words, according to Foot, do either of the two virtues offer good reasons to condemn active voluntary euthanasia? Why or why not? (reading to interpret20 pts) (b) Evaluate the arguments you just reconstructed in 4(a) above by raising at least one relevant and potentially powerful objection to some key claim in Foot's view and determining whether she could offer a reasonable response