As you learned in chapter $3,$ cross$-$examination in both civil and criminal trials is a right.

Why do you think cross$-$examination is a "right," as opposed to a "good thing"? What kind of judicial system would not allow cross$-$examination of witnesses as a matter of right? Provide an explanation.

In your post, please provide at least two APA references to support your answer $($You can utilize the textbook$).$ You can utilize the Purdue Online