Ash's mother Shashi wants to buy a shopping cart that will be suitable for carrying her weekly groceries home from the supermarket. She goes to a shop owned by Neville that specialises in the sale of shopping carts. Shashi tells Neville what she wants and asks for advice about which cart to buy. Neville recommends the Shopper Ultra model that sells for $150.00, but when Shashi asks about the Shopper Basic, which sells for only $49.95, Neville tells Shashi that it is 'not as good, but should be adequate'. Shashi buys the Shopper Basic. A few weeks later, she is unhappy because after using the cart to carry a stack of books back from the library, the fabric of the cart has started to tear. Has Neville breached the statutory implied term regarding fitness for purpose? See Business Law pp 300-306. Issue Has Neville breached the implied term regarding fitness for purpose? Law A seller will have breached the statutory implied term regarding fitness for purpose if all of the following requirements are satisfied. The contract is a contract for the sale of goods. The seller normally sells goods of that description. . The buyer has either expressly or by implication told the seller the purpose for which they were buying the goods. The buyer has relied on the seller's skill and judgement. The goods are not fit for the stated purpose. . The buyer has not requested the particular goods by their patent or trade name. Application The contract (is/is not) a contract for the sale of goods because ... Neville (does/does not) normally sell goods of that description because Shashi (has/has not) either expressly or by implication told Neville the purpose for which she was buying the goods because ... Shashi (has/has not) relied on Neville's skill and judgement because ... The goods (are/are not) fit for the stated purpose because ... Shashi (has/has not) requested the particular goods by their patent or trade name because