Assessment criteria: Students will be marked according to the following criteria: -Identification of the relevant legal issues -Identification of the relevant legal principles -Development of logical arguments by applying the relevant legal principles to the facts -Clear organisation of ideas, including correct and concise expression -Correct use of referencing conventions (using the Australian Guide to Legal Citation \"AGLC\") -Compliance with all formatting and word limit instructions LAW 101: Law, Business and Society Assignment Question Part 2 Rahul is a member of a local cycling club. The club recently decided it would be fun to do a coastal ride from Wollongong to Melbourne to raise money for a local charity. Twenty members of the club signed up to participate in the fundraiser. To celebrate the end of the fundraiser, the club agreed that they would like to stay on a few more days on Victoria's east coast. Rahul volunteered to help organise the accommodation for the trip. On Monday, Rahul saw an advertisement for accommodation on the internet, advertising accommodation at \"Bayside Resort\" (\"Bayside\"), five-star luxury accommodation for only $100 per night for a room that could accommodate 4 adults comfortably. Rahul realised this was an exceptionally good deal, but was not surprised because the advertisement stated that Bayside had only just opened and were running an opening special. Rahul emailed Bayside immediately and requested a group booking for 5 rooms for a three night stay at a total cost of $1,500. On Tuesday morning Rahul received an email from Bayside explaining that there had been a mistake and the internet advertisement should have said $100 per person, per night. Bayside explained that the accommodation for the group came to $6,000 for the three night stay. Rahul replied by email immediately, telling Bayside that he was very frustrated and that if he'd had known, he would never have made the booking. Bayside replied to Rahul's email. They apologised for the confusion and said that they wanted to keep their customers happy, and the best deal they could do was $3000 for the three nights. Bayside explained that Rahul would need to notify them by the close of business that day to confirm he wanted to proceed with the booking and that a 50% deposit would need to be paid at the time of confirmation. Rahul called a few of his mates from the cycle club immediately to check what he should do, and it was agreed that Rahul should book the accommodation for $3,000. Rahul called Bayside on Tuesday afternoon and left a voicemail message advising that he would like to proceed with the booking for the sum of $3,000. Bayside didn't listen to their voicemail messages until Wednesday morning. Bayside emailed Rahul stating that regretfully the deal had lapsed and the accommodation had been booked by another customer on Wednesday morning. Advise Rahul as to his legal position. Does an agreement exist? Include references to any case law and the relevant sections of any applicable legislation. Note: the assignment only covers material from weeks 3-6. For the purposes of answering this question, you are only looking at any agreement. Do not consider issues of consideration or intention. Part 2 should be no longer than 3 pages PLEASE READ MY INITIAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU