Assignment Directions Analyze the five scenarios listed below using the law you have learned thus far. Each analysis should be no less than 150 words in length and follow these guidelines: - Double-spaced - 12-point Times font - One inch margins - APA format (Title page, Citations, Reference page) - Correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation Scenarios 1. Anne is employed by Bradley Contracting Co. Bradley has a 1.3 million dollar contract to build a small group of outbuildings in a national park. Anne alleges that Bradley Contracting has discriminated against her, in that she has not been promoted to skilled craft positions with Bradley because it thinks that it is inappropriate for women to be in skilled craft position and that most of the male skilled craft workers are very much against having women in such positions. Knowing that Bradley Contracting Co. has a contract with the federal government, Anne brings suit against Bradley under Executive Order 11246 for gender discrimination. Will she be successful? Why or why not? 2. Sam has worked at Allied for several years with no problems. Avril is transferred into Sam's unit. Sam immediately begins having a strong allergic reaction to the perfume Avril wears each day. After having to take days off work because of his allergies, Sam asks Avril if she can tone down her perfume. Avril does so for a few days, then resumes her usual amount. Sam does not complain any further but is thinking of quitting because his allergies are so bad. He doesn't want to go any further with Avril about it because Sam is white and Avril is Asian, and Sam thinks it might lead to a race discrimination liability for his employer. Is Sam correct? 3. A white college receptionist is fired when it is found that she told a black college applicant that the applications for admissions are distinguished by race by the notation of a small RH in the corner of black applicants' applications. "RH," she says, is her supervisor's term for "raisin heads," which he calls African-Americans. Is the employee entitled to reinstatement? 4. A white, non-Latino meat cutter was fired by his supermarket employer and replaced with a Latino worker for reasons he believes were racially motivated. Can he sue the company for national origin discrimination? Is it possible to commit national origin discrimination by favoring a Latino person over a white, non-Latino person? If so, what would the terminated employee need to prove to satisfy a prima facie case and then to succeed overall? 5. Mateo Silva, an American citizen of Puerto Rican dissent, alleged that his employer, Service Caster Corp, subjected him to a hostile work environment and to disparate treatment because of his national origin. His supervisor repeatedly made offensive and unwelcome derogatory remarks about persons of Puerto Rican national origin. The supervisor refereed to Silva and other Puerto Rican employees as "filthy, drug-addicted, welfare recipients" who are "lazy" and "devalue" the community where they reside. When Hurricane Maria devastated the island, the supervisor told Silva that Puerto Ricans "deserved to experience devastating effects of hurricanes." After Silva complained about the supervisor's remarks, he faced threats, harassment, denial of overtime, reduced work hours, pay reduction, and was coerced to sign a document written in English that he did not understand. If Silva is an American citizen, and was born in the U.S., can he still make a claim of discrimination on the basis of national origin? On another issue, was the employer required to provide documents in Spanish, Silva's first language, for him to sign