Assume that Patty and David have been married for five years. David is at work one day when he is served with an ex parte order of protection granting Patty exclusive possession of the home, prohibiting David from contacting Patty and barring David from seeing their children until after a hearing scheduled ten days later. In the petition, Patty accuses David of several acts of violence, which David denies. Patty alleges that David has threatened to kidnap the children if Patty moves out of the marital home. David is outraged that he cannot go home and see his children and that all of this can happen to him without his having a chance to tell his side of the story. David contacts an attorney for advice. Have David's due process rights been violated? Question 5 options: a) Yes, David's due process rights have been violated by the issuance of the ex parte protective order. b) No, David's due process rights have not been violated by the issuance of the ex parte protective order