Assume$$that$$the$$following$$facts$$and$$circumstances$$are$$grounded in$$evidence: a$.$A$$retired$$couple$$has$$a$$lifetime$$of$$community$$involvement and$$service$.$ b$.$Evidence$$supports$$the$$retired$$couple$$becoming$$involved$$in$$a money$$laundering$$scheme$$late$$in$$life$$through$$a$$small$$business owned$$and$$operated$$by$$them$.$ c$.$Evidence$$suggests$$that$$the$$benefit$($conversion$)$to$$the$$retired couple$$is$$nominal$,$and$$most$$estimates$$suggest$$monetary$$benefits of$$approximately$$zero$.$ d$.$Evidence$$eliminates$$all$$employees$,$except$$the$$owners$,$of involvement$$in$$the$$money$$laundering$$activity$.$ e$.$The$$retired$$couple$$has$$a$$son$$who$$has$$a$$history$$of$$drug$$use$$and minor$$drug$$trafficking$.$ f$.$The$$means$$by$$which$$the$$money$$is$$passing$$through$$the$$small business$$is$$connected$$by$$evidence$$to$$the$$son$.$ Case$$discussion:$$Which$$fraud$$model$,$the$$fraud$$triangle$,$the$$fraud$$scale$,$ or$$the$$acronym$$M$.$I.C$.$E$.,$offers$$the$$best$$possible$$explanation$$for$$the actions$$of$$the$$couple$?$Why$?$