Question
Assuming an oil-exploration company is negotiating for rights to drill for oil in Tracts C and D, which are near each other. The company's geological
Assuming an oil-exploration company is
negotiating for rights to drill for oil in Tracts C and D, which are near each other. The company's
geological expert has estimated that the probability of finding oil at Tract C is 0.1. The expert has
also estimated that the conditional probability of oil at Tract D given oil at Tract C would be 0.4.
Finally, the expert has estimated that the conditional probability of oil at Tract D given no oil at
Tract C would be 0.02.
Question (1). Using the expert's probability assessments, compute the probability of oil at Tract
D, and then compute the conditional probability of oil at Tract C given oil at Tract D. (6 points)
Question (2). Suppose that the expert asserts that oil at Tract D is just as likely as oil at Tract C.
This assertion suggests that at least one of the expert's three assessments must be wrong. Suppose
that the expert feels quite confident about his estimate of the probability of C and his estimate of
the conditional probability of oil at D given oil at C. To be consistent with this new assertion, how
would he have to change the conditional probability of oil at D given no oil at C? (4 points)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started