1. Assuming that it would be more efficient to require the joinder of joint tortfeasors, what interests or policies are instead given priority here?
2. Given the narrow scope of Rule 19(a), the Temple Court seems to have found it unnecessary to parse the language of the three categories of "necessary party" status. Work carefully through the language of Rule 19(a) and be able to explain why a joint tortfeasor is not a necessary party.