Assuming the role of the judge in the Dress Code Flips Burger Joint case, analyze the legal issues presented by the parties.

1. How would one rule on each of the issues presented based on the Legal analysis religious discrimination cases under Title VII (see EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car LLC, Tiano v. Dillards Dept. Stores, Inc, and Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp) and then:
2. Use the IRAC method to apply the law to the facts and reach a legal conclusion based on your analysis.
3. Did Ms. Djarra establishe a prima facie case of religious discrimination against her by Mr. Johnson.
4. Did Mr. Johnson make a good faith effort to offer reasonable accommodations to Ms. Djarra or whether Mr. Johnson could not reasonably accommodate Ms. Djarra without undue hardship.
5. What types of damages available under Title VII and the type and amount of damages to be awarded to Ms. Djarra, if any.

Reference Information:

McGraw-Hill. (n.d.).YBTJ_religious_prof_plaint(Links to an external site.)[Video clip]. InReligious discrimination: Dress code flips burger joint[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.viddler.com/embed/7809aa51/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0

McGraw-Hill. (n.d.).YBTJ_religious_react_def(Links to an external site.)[Video clip]. InReligious discrimination: Dress code flips burger joint[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.viddler.com/embed/d926e64f/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0

McGraw-Hill. (n.d.).YBTJ_religious_react_plain(Links to an external site.)[Video clip]. InReligious discrimination: Dress code flips burger joint[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.viddler.com/embed/40d12d2e/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0

EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car LLC., 432 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (D. Ariz. 2006). Download EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car LLC., 432 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (D. Ariz. 2006).

Tiano v. Dillards Dept. Stores, Inc., 139 F.3d 679 (9th Cir. 1998). Download Tiano v. Dillards Dept. Stores, Inc., 139 F.3d 679 (9th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014). Download United States v. Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014).