At the trial Construction Company, introduced evidence showing that Paul had been warned by his supervisor not to work near the scaffolding until it had been thoroughly checked, since it looked unsafe. However, Paul had disregarded the supervisor's instruction. Mary had then produced a witness who testified that Paul had always objected to working close to scaffolding. If no further evidence was introduced by either side: Question 13Select one: a. Construction Company's motion for a motion for a judgment as a matter of law (directed verdict) would have to be granted. b. Construction Company's motion for a directed verdict would have to be denied. c. Mary's motion for a judgment as a matter of law (directed verdict) would have to be granted. d. If the jury brought in a verdict in favor of Construction Company, Mary's motion for a renewed judgment as a matter of law (JNOV) would have to be granted