b. In February 2010, IKEA fired two members of its executive board from Russia, Per Kaufman and Stefan Gross, for engaging in corrupt practices with suppliers or suppliers its branch in St. Petersburg. Kaufman and Gross paid bribes to energy companies for ensure that the shop will still have electricity. even though this practice has been quite common in Russia, has explicitly proven the value of the company IKEA. Questions: a) Describe the IKEA bribery case from a Kantian perspective and virtue ethics. What is considered problematic from this perspective regarding bribery? b) Do you agree with the explanation of each perspective? c) Which theory-based explanation do you agree with? Explain why!