Barry Allen walked along a downtown Phoenix street late at night and observed two police officers walking towards him. He quickly crossed to the other side by jay-walking. This raised the officers' suspicion and they followed him across the street.As they approached from behind to question him, Barry started walking faster, almost jogging, away from them. The officers, with over 15 years' experience on the downtown patrol, overtook Barry and stopped him. One officer frisked him for weapons and found a concealed, unlicensed handgun. They then made a more thorough search and found 20 packets of cocaine in his cargo pants. Barry filed a motion to suppress the drug evidence. Will the court likely suppress the evidence?

Group of answer choices

A. Yes, because the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Barry simply because he crossed the street and walked faster away from them.

B. Yes, because Barry had a right to cross the street and he had a right to walk faster to avoid being harassed by the police.

C. No, because the police had probable cause to make an arrest when Barry began to walk away from them and then to evade them by walking even faster as they followed him.

D. No, because Barry's suspicious behavior led the police to have a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity may be afoot.Thus, this was a proper stop and frisk procedure.