1. Based on the Lecture, Catalyst's Friendship documentary and readings, please explain Dunbar's Social Brain Hypothesis and how brains, gossip and friends fit into it

(10 marks)

2. In the "Superbugs" Four Corners documentary we saw superbugs in action in Australia.

a) Please detail one example from the documentary; include the name of the infection and the micro-organism (if given), how it was (probably) contracted, and consequences for the patient and how they dealt with the infection when antibiotics no longer work.(5 marks).

b) In your opinion, explain which of these superbugs is of the greatest threat to Australia? Support your opinion with evidence. (5 marks)

3. In our Week 7 Class we examine Catalano et al.'s (2005) article Population stress and the Swedish sex ratio that looks at the impact of stress during pregnancy on the sex ratio in Sweden. Please explain

a) what is the measure of population stress they use (3 marks)

b) how is the stressor measured to differentiate between the different hypotheses they are testing (2 marks)

c) evaluate whether this a good way to measure stress and detail how you would design a better measure of stress for this study(10 marks)? Include at least 1 reference to support your argument in (c)correctly referenced

4. From Lectures, Readings and your own research, describe how empathy is likely to have evolved in humans. You may find this question is related to other topics during the semester.Include at least 1 reference to support your descriptioncorrectly referenced (see ECU reference guide) (10 marks)

5. In the Week 9 Tutorial we will examine the topic of racist science. As part of the tutorial you will form a small group of students (4 or 5) and examine one of the critiques of Kanazawa's (2006) Mind the gap article (see reference in unit outline). There are at least 5 critiques available here http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.2007.12.issue-2/issuetoc. In small groups you will present the arguments of the critique you have been given. In the tutorial each group will present their critique. Below, please detail which critiques you think presents the strongest argument against Kanazawa (2006). Justify your choice with evidence from the original and critique articles. 5 clear critique points are required. (20 marks)

Critique Reference(s):

6. In our Tutorials we watched the SYNERGIES: Walking Together - Belonging to Country documentary made here in WA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeGqTpLDYjQ).

a) The documentary focuses on two different ways of looking at the world, from the video and potentially some follow-up research, describe these two perspectives (5 marks)

b) Detail one example from the documentary where the two perspectives complement each other (where they meet or inform or support each other) (5 marks)