Because of the issues Crawford has had with his wedding photography business, she wishes to resort to a liquidated damages clause in her sales contracts to encourage performance or provide an acceptable amount of damages. Regarding the contemplated resort to a liquidated damages clause, what must Crawford be aware of in construction the liquidated damages clause? Explain fully, using the correct rule of law. (10 points) Charley the chimney sweep signs a contract with Marry Poppins under which, he will clear her chimney every time it gets clogged for the next five years and Mary will pay Charlie $10,000 per year. On October 5th, Mary's Chimney was clogged. She waited for Charley to show up, but he did not show up.Because it was clogged when she used the fireplace the house caught fire and did $20000 worth of damage to the house.Even though Mary did not call Charley to tell him the chimney was clogged, Mary has sued Charley for the damages, claiming that he breached the contract to unclog her chimney, because he did not show up, and that was the reason for the fire.Who will win and why?You must do legal analysis.(worth 15 points). Crawford owns a wedding photography business. Crawford has several photographers he sometimes contracts with when he gets too busy. He entered into firm agreement to photograph Sirhan's wedding on October 10, 2019. On October 9thCrawford had a fire at his business that destroyed all his camera's and other equipment. Since Crawford had no photography equipment, he did not show up to photograph the wedding. Sirhan has now sued Crawford for breach of contract. Who will win and why? Explain fully, using a complete legal analysis.Whatever answer you come up with must be fully defended based on the proper rule of law. (15 points) Instead of a fire at Crawford's business, assume that on September 10th, after Crawford and Sirhan entered into the photography contract for the October 10thwedding, Sirhan call Crawford and tell her that the wedding has been cancelled because he and is finance broke up. Crawford says that he still expects to be paid due to the contract they have. Sirhan refuses to pay.Crawford did not book another wedding for the 10thand did not even make an attempt to book another wedding.Crawford files a lawsuit on October 11thfor the $3000 fee they had agreed to.Discuss the legal issues raised by these facts in regard to whether or not Crawford will win or lose?You must address all of the legal issue raised by these facts. (15 points) You do not have to do IRAC analysis for this question. Please mention issue, analysis, rule and conclusion