Because we are talking about "legal analysis" and "thinking like a lawyer," why don't we discuss the distinctions in our weekly discussion? In your Week 5 initial post, discuss the difference between everyday "common sense" and the reasoning process involved in legal analysis. How do lawyers approach issues and apply reasoning to a legal problem differently from the way people approach a discussion or problems in everyday life? Because these questions pose the presupposition that the ways of thinking are different, please feel free to argue the antithesis. In addition, how do you apply common sense, logical reasoning, and/or legal analysis to your everyday life? Have you viewed or approached recent hot-button issues differently from the inception of this course? If so, please provide an example.