Behaviorists have argued that the premise of perfect rationality in conventional economics should be rejected, or just set aside, because it is patently false. In chapter $15$ McKenzie and Lee argue that

Group of answer choices

since economics is a social science, the nature of its assumptions must be different than those used in the natural sciences

stylized, or $$unreal$,$ premises in science can advance the development of insights because they clarify and simplify analyses that would otherwise be too complex.

careful investigation by neuro$-$economists have actually confirmed the assumption of perfect rationality.

All of the above

None of the above