Berlin and Locke argue for a limited state. Do their arguments convince you? Why or why not?

Think about this in particular from the standpoint of your future self working in an agency. Locke and Berlin argue that most of the time, it's a bad idea to substitute your own judgement for the judgment of others, and we should tend to let people do what they want, even if we think it's a bad idea for them. What would that mean for you in your professional capacity?