Betty, storage clerkand a long term employeeat PineApple's customer service center in San Jose, California wascalled into the security office to speak with investigators about 15 missing i-pads from the storage room. It was suspected that the i-pads were stolen, that it must have been an "inside job" by workers in thedepartment. Betty agreed to answer questions during her shift at work and volunteered to provide a sworn writtenstatement. Betty entered theroom and sat down with her back to the door and heard the door close and the lock engage. After a 45 minute interrogation the investigators and her boss were convincedthat Betty had something to do with the missingi-pads but still had no reliable evidence of such, just a mere gut feeling and suspicion. Finally, after an additional 3 hours of questioning Betty signed the sworn written statement denying any involvement and was free to go back to her office. Whenshe got home from work, Betty called her best-friend and co-workerAngie who hadheard the rumors thatthe companywas accusingBetty the storage clerk stole the i-pads. Everyone thought it was outrageous how Betty was treated and basically accusedof stealing thei-pads. She recommended that Bettyspeak with her friend,attorney, Will Cheatham. After a conference withhim, Mr Cheathamfiled suit against PineApple claiming thatBetty was falsely Imprisoned by overzealousinvestigators and bossof PineApplebyholding Bettyagainsther will for over three hours. PineApple claims that Betty presented herself voluntarily and was always free to leave. Betty argued that she felt that if she did notcooperate and tried to leave thatshe would have beenfired.

Please explain therights and liabilitiesof theparties in this lawsuit. Present thebest arguments for both sides Betty and PineApple. Who will prevail? Use any case law thatis relevant to resolve andsupportyour position.