BFair trade advocates suggest that developed nations should agree to sell their agricultural products at guaranteed prices. For example, a tomato would be $1.00 everywhere in the world, regardless of what the price might be right now at the Scottsburg Wal-Mart (maybe 63). The incentive is that by offering a good for the exact same price everywhere, it would benefit people from, say, Brazil where a tomato is currently $1.43 (I'm just guessing at the price here). The end result would be that citizens in more developed nations would pay more, but the citizens in less developed nations would pay less. Fair trade is part of the Dependency Theory.ased upon the example provided above, would you be willing to pay more for your food if it benefited poorer nations? Let's change the scenario, if you had to pay 5 every time you looked at your phone, but it allowed poorer nations to have access to the internet (and phones) would you agree