Billy is engaged in the criminal activity of cooking methamphetamine in his home. A couple of police officers while randomly passing through the neighborhood saw Billy go to the mailbox. They thought that he looked a little scruffy, and they were concerned that they had not made a sufficient number of arrests in the past month. They decided to "check out" Billy. Therefore, they immediately broke down Billy's door, searched his home, and arrested him. The police officer in charge told Billy that because meth was involved, he lost his rights against self$-$incrimination and that he might as well confess. Billy proceeded to confess to cooking meth and a number of other crimes. The judge was so angry with Billy that he threw him in jail for two months without any kind of hearing. Billy's lawyer is concerned that the judge has not granted Billy a hearing. Which of the following is one right that the judge has violated?

Billy $\text{'}$s right to substantive due process.

Billy's Second Amendment rights.

Billy's First Amendment rights.

Billy's Fourth Amendment rights.

Billy's right to procedural due process.