Bob and Pauline are married in New Mexico where both are domiciled. Bob travels to Montana and files for divorce in a Montana state court. Once the divorce is granted, he returns to New Mexic Neither he nor Pauline were ever domiciled in Montana. Bob then marries Lorraine in New Mexico, Lorraine and Bob separate after having marital difficulties. Lorraine brings s separate maintenance) against Bob in New Mexico. Bob's defense is that he is not married to Lorraine because the Montana divorce is inmalid due to the fact that neither benor Pauline was made in Montana when he obtained the Montana divorce. Hence he is still married to Pauline and has no duty to support Lorraine. r COURSES Study Tools College Success Tips Bob's argument is that the Montana divorce: Oa is invalid because the Montana court did not have in rem jurisdiction to dissolve the marriage b, is invalid because the Montana court did not have personal jurisdiction over Pauline Career Success Tips 2 Help Oc is a divisible divorce Dd is invalid because the Montana court did not have personal jurisdiction over Bob