Both OHAYAMI lines and CODA lines are domestic corporations. The former has in its favor a certificate of public convenience to operate a public utility bus air-conditioned service from Manila City to Sagada and vice-versa with the use of twenty (20) units.Subsequently, CODA lines filed a petition with Board of Transportation for the issuance of a certificate of public convenience to operate a similar service on the same line.Eight days later, without the required publication, the Board issued an order granting it provisional permit to operate such bus service on the line applied for. OHAYAMI lines questioned the issuance of the provisional permit on the ground of absence of hearing, as required. Is the contention of OHAYAMI correct? Explain your answer with reasons.