Brad, a California resident, uses his popular blog to make false and disparaging comments about a dog breeding business incorporated and headquartered in the state of Illinois, Dog Delight, Inc. ("Dog Delight"). Brad knows that Dog Delight's business is located in Illinois, that the false and disparaging comments he posts online from his home in California will be seen by other clients of Dog Delight including in Illinois, and that the comments will likely harm Dog Delight by damaging its reputation and decreasing its revenues by scaring away potential clients.If Dog Delight sues Brad in a federal district court in California, alleging only a state law defamation claim (a claim that Brad's words wrongfully harmed Dog Delight's business reputation), seeking damages totaling $50,000, which of the following would likely be true:

Group of answer choices

The case will be dismissed.

Unless the parties settle, the case will be fully litigated in the federal district court in California and Dog Delight will win.

The case will be transferred to a federal district court in Illinois.

Unless the parties settle, the case will be fully litigated in the federal district court in California and Brad will win.