Briefcase

1-tort case

1-contract case.

below is the method to do I will post the link below in the comments

The 1-tort case------ Rubin v Sabharwal (2021 NY Slip Op 50102(U)) (nycourts.gov)

The contract case-------JENNIFER J. BURRELL, JONATHAN ROBERT H. STURDY PERRY, and JOHN CRONIN, as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERTA G. SINNOTT, Defendants. ROBERT H. STURDY, BARRY SMALL, and COLLEEN FRENCH

IFACTS:Set forth a brief summary of the facts of the case.Begin by identifying who is bringing the action, against whom the action is brought, and what relief may be sought.Summarize the underlying facts of the case concisely.Leave out facts that may have been discussed in the case and which you believe are not necessary for understanding the court's decision.Use your own language.Do not just copy portions of the court's decision.

II PROCEDURAL POSTURE:In this part of the case brief, you should set forth a brief statement of how the decision came to be issued procedurally. Explain how it was that the court came to render the decision.

Was it a decision that resulted from a motion?If so, explain which party made the motion and what the relief was that was sought by the motion.Was the decision issued by the judge during or after a trial?If so, state whether it was a jury trial or a non-jury (bench) trial.

III ISSUES[S]:State the issue or issues the court decided.Each issue should be set forth as a question. In a short decision, there may be only one issue.In a complicated, lengthy decision, there could be many issues.You should specify each issue the court decided.

IV DECISION:Set forth the decision reached by the court with respect to each of the issues presented.Essentially, you are now stating how the court decided each of the issues which you specified.This section, only indicates what the court's decision was.Do not include the court's reasoning or explanation in this section.The court's reasoning or explanation should be set forth in the next section.

VREASONING:This is a concise summary of the reasoning used by the court in reaching the decision which it reached with respect to each of the issues.Do not include case citations that the court cited.Summarize the points the court made in arriving at its decision.It is the reasoning of the court, not your opinion of the issues or of the decision that should be included here.[If you would like to set forth your opinion of the particular issue or issues being decided or of the decision, you should do so in a postscript at the end of the case brief.]