Business Law Help Please

1. Which of the following is NOT required to prove negligence?

1. Intent
2. Breach
3. Duty
4. Causation

2. To decide whether there is causation in common law negligence, a court must address

1. Four questions
2. One question
3. Three questions
4. Two questions

3. A superseding cause

1. Is not part of common law negligence
2. Shows that someone was acting heroically
3. Means that the defendant was especially liable
4. Relieves a defendant of liability

4. Under res ipsa loquitur,

1. The facts speak for themselves
2. A resident is never liable
3. Compensatory damages are not permitted
4. A residet is always liable

5. Negligence per se may occur if

1. There is a violation of a statute or ordinance
2. A tort causes only minor injuries
3. A defendant violates the reasonable person standard
4. A tort causes more harm than usual

6. Dram shop acts

1. Require that doctors use great care
2. Require that scientists use great care
3. Provide a legal defense for small businessowners
4. Pertain to bars and taverns

7. Strict liability is

1. Liability without fault
2. Being flexible with the law
3. A legal concept that does not exist in the U.S.
4. Being strict if a defendant is at fault

8. The notion that there are large numbers of "frivolous lawsuits" is often spread by

1. Attorneys
2. Civil rights advocates
3. Public health advocates
4. Large industries

9. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory case

1. Caused minor injuries
2. Occurred in 2014
3. Showed compliance with safety standards
4. Caused many deaths

10. A tort involves

1. A violation of international law
2. A private wrong
3. A violation of the 1st Amendment
4. A criminal infraction