Business Law Question:

A woman from British Columbia, Saliha Alnoor, recently sued Colgate-Palmolive, alleging that she was injured by a defective toothbrush. She stated that the toothbrush snapped as she was brushing her teeth, which injured her gums and caused them to bleed profusely. Alnoor claimed that she had endured permanent injury and sought damages, including $94 000 in anticipated treatments. Colgate denied any wrongdoing. Soon after the trial began, the judge made several rulings against Alnoor, who was self-represented. Alnoor later agreed to drop her claim in response to Colgates offer to waive legal costs against her (estimated at about $30 000) if she did so. According to the National Post, Alnoors brother stated as follows: We spent $21 000 on lawyers and experts, but we have no regrets. Now we know how justice works. Now we are much wiser.

In two paragraphs answer: Why do you think this matter proceeded to litigation? What are the risks Colgate faced from the litigation? What are Alnoors risks? What side do you favour and why?