C A learn-ca-central-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/608c469a54e8d/6809875?X-Blackboard-Expiration=16659432000008X-Blackboard-Signature=VNxdmtaojfHZOaVOHrXL5tdwpSOevUZOCkpTHS5IRQ%3D&X-Blackboard-Client-Id=3066378... [ 6809875 1 / 8 100% + Case 4:20-cv-07908-HSG Document 57 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 8 UA W N UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, Case No. 20-cv-07908-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Re: Dkt. No. 40 10 DROPBOX, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Dropbox, Inc.'s motion to compel arbitration, 14 briefing for which is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 40 ("Mot."), 42 ("Opp."), 47 ("Reply").' The Court 3 15 United States District Court Northern District of California heard oral argument on the motion on January 20, 2022. See Dkt. No. 54. For the reasons 16 detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Pro Se Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes III filed this action against Defendant on November 19 9, 2020. Dkt. No. 1. He then filed an amended complaint on January 21, 2021. Dkt. No. 10 20 ("Am. Comp."). Plaintiff alleges that his Dropbox account was compromised in a 2012 data 21 breach, which put his personal information at risk. Id. at 2. Plaintiff further alleges that Dropbox 22 failed to inform him of the breach, and that his personal information has been stolen and used by 23 "hackers and cyber criminals." Id. Plaintiff asserts that as a result of the data breach his bank GDP David Sifuentes v..pdf A PDF] case summary.pdf Show all X 11'C Partly sunny W ^ OF ENG 9:18 AM US 2022-10-16