c. At the 10% significance level, what is your conclusion about the overall significance of the model? I (Click to select) | Ho because the p-value is (Click to select) | than the significance level. I (Click to select) | sufficient evidence to conclude that the explanatory variables (Click to select) |jointly significant in explaining Return. d. Set the hypotheses that check for the significance of the Expense variable: Ho: (Click to select) v (Click to select) v HA: (Click to select) v (Click to select) v e. What is the test statistic for the significance of the Expense variable? f. At the 10% significance level, what is your conclusion about the significance of the Expense variable? I (Click to select) | Ho because the p-value is (Click to select) | than the significance level. I (Click to select) | sufficient evidence to conclude that the Expense variable (Click to select) |significant in explaining Return, after accounting for (Click to select) vAn investment analyst wants to examine the relationship between a mutual fund's return, its turnover rate, and its expense ratio. She randomly selects 10 mutual funds and estimates: Return = Bo + B1 Turnover + ByExpense + &, Where Return is the average five-year return (in %), Turnover is the annual holdings turnover (in %), Expense is the annual expense ratio (in %), and & is the random error component. A portion of the regression results is shown in the accompanying table. df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 93.33 46.67 4.90 0.047 Residual 66.69 9.53 Total 9 160.02 Coefficients Standard Error t-stat p-value Intercept 30.60 4.30 7.12 0.000 Turnover 0.13 0.06 2.23 0.061 Expense 0.90 4.08 0.22 0.831 a. Set the hypotheses that check for the overall significance of the model: Ho: (Click to select) HA: (Click to select) b. What is the test statistic for the overall significance of the model