C End-of-module a X Computerized Co X Course Hero X Q can i save a pdf a X Q any free pdf to jp X PDE Computerized Cc X + X @ https://learn2.open.ac.uk/b6/c4/b6c4cbcc3a09831155c7d240d76032868f0613c6?response-co... C M . . BCU Managed favourites H. INTREPID iCloud Betsi Cadwalad S BCU Patient Safety.. Original contacts fo.. Sign IN - Open Uni... BCU Patient Safety... G Google Draw 2 | |A a& Ask Copilot + 7 of 11 503 Teachers Inattentive 1.33 (0.61) 1.39 (0.56) .75 Total 1.04 (0.54) 1.04 (0.47) 99 Note. n = number of participants; socioeconomic level = the economic strata would correspond approximately to A = upper class, B = high middle and middle classes, C = low middle class and vulnerable; SNAP = Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham. A B 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 CT Group Non-active Group CT Group Non-active Group Pre Intervention Post Intervention Pre Intervention Post Intervention Figure 2. (a) Baseline and postintervention SNAP-IV inattention parent score in CT and nonactive groups (p = .58, g = 0.03) and (b) baseline and postintervention SNAP-IV inattention teacher score in CT and nonactive groups (p = .58, g = 0.21). Note. SNAP = Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham; CT = cognitive training. Type here to search 11:25 02/06/2024 22