C. Using either Google Scholar or Westlaw Campus Research, look up the following case entitled Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. Don King, 533 U.S. 158 (2001) and answer the following question after reading the U.S. Supreme Court Opinion. Briefly, the Petitioner, Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd., is a corporation that promotes boxing matches. Petitioner sued Don King, the president and sole shareholder/owner of Don King Productions, a corporation, claiming that King had conducted the boxing-related affairs of Don King Productions in part through a RICO "pattern," i.e., through the alleged commission of at least two instances of fraud and other RICO predicate crimes. The lower courts dismissed the complaint because, in their view, RICO and its provisions apply only where a plaintiff shows the existence of two separate entities, a "person" and a distinct "enterprise," the affairs of which that "person" improperly conducts. In this case, "it is undisputed that King was an employee" (and sole owner) of the corporation Don King Productions and that King was also "acting within the scope of his authority." Did the Supreme Court find that Don King violated the RICO Act? Explain why or why not.

Section IV. Identify and explain three significant differences between the Criminal Law and the Civil Law that involve the parties, the burden of proof and the remedies sought.