Question: CA affirns disciplinary proceedings vs students linked to UP haning care Published October 14, 2016 1:07am The Court of Appeals (CA) has affirmed its
CA affirns disciplinary proceedings vs students linked to UP haning care Published October 14, 2016 1:07am The Court of Appeals (CA) has affirmed its decision allowing the University of the Philippimes aP t the administrative proceedings against students suspected to have been nvolved in the fatal hazing o ie Anthony Mendez in 2007, Penned by Associate Justice Zenaida Galapate-Laguilles, the CA 10th Divisi Chs pat on its October 6, 2015 decision reversing the ruling of the Quezon City Regional Trial Court that mu the proceedings of the UP Student Disciplinary Tribunal (UP SDT). The petitioners mchude Arisl Podinned Marcelino Veloso III, Keefee de la Cruz, and Armand Lorenze Sapital, who are part of the 13 menhers ef ee, Sigma Rho Fraternity accused of participating in the violent initiation rites that took the life of Mendez public aduinistration student. In their appeal, the petitioners reiterated that Section 1, Rule II. of the Br Governing Fraternities relating to the filing of charges is similar to existing rulks on preliminary investigation in criminal cases. They said deviating from the provision is a violation of due process, The petitioners also criticized the preliminary inquiries since it was alkgedly conducted by the University Prosecutor instead of a meutber of the UP-SDT as stated in the Rules Governing Fraternities. The CA said he case was administrative in nature, thus "it is not subject to the rigorous requirements of criminal du "The preliminary inquiry and the formal charges herein are but components of the investigative and disciplinary action an acaemic university is mandated to take against its students suspected of being engaged in hazing activities," the appellate court said. "What is at stake here is not the petitioners-appellees' liberty from crimimal incarceration, but their contimued admission to an institution of higher karning, which is discretionary upon a school, the same being a privilege on the part of the student rather than a right," it added. Investigators said Mendez was seen in a compound at Bomifacio Village, Quezon City along with other young men before he was brought to the Veteran's Memorial Medical Center on August 27, 2007. Mendez, 20, was pronounced dead an arrival by doctors noting seeral hematomas on his wrists, thighs and feet. His death sparked calls for justice and condenmation from various groups inchuding the UP Diliman administration on the use of violence as a prerequisite for adumission into any organization. BAP, GMA News process." Retrieved from https://wwse.gmanetwark com/neus/news/metra/584950/ ca-affirms-disciptinary-proceedings-us-students- inked-to-up-hazing-case/story/ Think About This! 1. What is the article about? 2. Can one justify that the "culture" of fraternities deserves respect? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this claim? 3. What are the ill effects of hazing? 4. ABC Fraternity is the most prestigious fraternity in your school. Its members are high ranking government officials and rich business owners. Your teacher recruits you on the promise that you will be spared from hazing. Would you join the fraternity? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
This article is related to Court of Appeals CA has affirmed in the case of the University of the Phi... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
