Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Calculate lost profit damagesand royaltiesin the Cat Toy Case assuming that the only other company selling infringing cat toys is SportPet. Give some background on
Calculate lost profit damagesand royaltiesin the Cat Toy Case assuming that the only other company selling infringing cat toys is SportPet.
Give some background on how you proceeded to turn those assumed lost sales into actual lost profits (paragraph or two)
(Calculations have already been started on the attached excel spreadsheet on the calculations tab.They need to be fixed as they are incorrect. The suggestions are highlighted in yellow)
1 2 3 4 5 Richard A. Clegg (SBN 211213) LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD CLEGG 501 West Broadway, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 400-4920 Facsimile: (619) 400-4929 rick@rclegglaw.com 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 PAUL COMERFORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 COMPLAINT v. 14 15 '11CV0014 JAH JMA CIVIL ACTION NO. __________________ SPORTPET DESIGNS, INC. AND JURY DEMAND 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff Paul Comerford ("Comerford") alleges as follows for his complaint against defendant SportPet Designs, Inc. ("SportPet"). PARTIES 22 23 1. Comerford is an individual who resides in Murrietta, California. 24 2. Comerford is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that SportPet 25 is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, with a 26 principal place of business at 1801 Airport Road, Suite A, Waukesha, Wisconsin. 27 28 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is an action for patent infringement, arising under the patent laws of the United States, including 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. This court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 4. SportPet is subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district on the basis that (a) SportPet has regularly promoted and offered products for sale to customers within this judicial district, including through interactive websites that allow customers to order SportPet products via the Internet from within this judicial district; (b) plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that SportPet has actually sold or shipped products, including the products that are accused of infringement in this action, to customers within this judicial district; and (c) SportPet has placed its products, including the products that are accused of infringement in this action, into the stream of 15 commerce, through established channels of distribution, knowing or reasonably expecting 16 that the products would be (and were, in fact) transported into this judicial district and 17 sold to customers within this judicial district. 18 19 5. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c) and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1400. 20 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 21 INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,823,541 22 6. On November 2, 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly 23 and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,823,541 ("the '541 Patent"), entitled "Cat 24 Toy," to Comerford. Since that date, Comerford has been and still is the owner of the 25 '541 Patent. A true and correct copy of the '541 Patent is attached as Exhibit A to this 26 Complaint. 27 28 7. SportPet has infringed the '541 Patent by, inter alia, using, selling and offering to sell products that are encompassed by one or more claims of the '541 Patent, 2 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND 1 2 3 4 within the United States, during the term of the "541 Patent, without Comerford's authorization. The infringing products include SportPet's electronic cat toy products sold under the names "CATCH ME IF YOU CAN" and "POUNCING PAWS". 8. Comerford has suffered monetary damages as a result of SportPet's acts of 5 infringement. 6 9. Comerford has suffered irreparable harm as a result of SportPet's acts of 7 infringement and will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless and until SportPet is 8 9 enjoined from committing further acts of infringement. REQUEST FOR RELIEF 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Comerford prays for the following relief: 1. A fmal injunction against continued infringements by SportPet; 2. Judgment that SportPet has infringed the '541 Patent, with an award of damages adequate to compensate Comerford for SportPet's infringement, along with prejudgment interest; 16 2. An assessment of Comerford's costs of suit against SportPet; and 17 4. Such other and further relief as the Court deems proper. 18 DEMAND FOR JURY 19 20 Plaintiff demands a trial by jury as to all issues that are so triable. 21 Respectfully submitted, 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: January 5, 2010 Richard A. Clegg Counsel for Plaintiff, Pau 27 28 3 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' !"#$%$&'(&)(*)+,-.$/&( ' ' ' 01( !234546(7.7(891'1(,:6;?@AB?CD0E(F((,:G;H(.0I.@( !"#$%$&'($)&'&*'' +*,-(.$/&'0*1'-.&!/&'$/01$/2!,!/&' Illm~IIIIIII~:11111111111 US007823541 B2 United States Patent (10) Comerford (12) (45) (54) CATTOY (76) Inventor: Paul Comerford, 38073 Augu$ta Dr., Murrieta. CA (US) 9256., Subject to any Qisclaimer, the term of this pate)lt is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. lS4(b) by 330 days. ( .) Notice: (21) Appl. No.: 12/129,974 (22) Filed: May 30, 2008 Prior Public..tion Data (65) Sep. 23, 2010 US 2010/0236496A1 Patent No.: US 7,823,541 B2 Date of Patent: Nov. 2, 201 j) 3,272,507 3,665,892 3,716;029 3,999,751 4,422,257 4,S17,922 4,940,018 5.579,725 5,634,435 S,8()6,465 5,875,736 6,345,593 6.684.8.19 6,939.195 2002l0lJ94748 2002/0174839 A A A A A A A A A ' A A" Bl" Bl" Bl" AI" AI" 9/1966 Grau 5/1972 Ku,isto 211973 Pillsbury. Jr. 1211976 Scardino 1211983 McCrory 511985 7/1990 1211996 6/1997 9/1998 3/1999 212002 212()04 9f2QI)S 1/2002 11/2002 Lind Edling BOshears ........,........... 1191706 Udellutal................. 1191706 Baiera at at. ................ 1191707 Uddledal ................. 1191706 Stewart et aI. .. ............ J191706 LockD......................... 119n07 Hunt et aI................... 446r.!9S Baik .......................... 4461227 Hortlatll ...................... 1191701 cited by examiner Related U.s. ApplltatlOil Data (60) Provisional application No . 60/932,503, filed on Jun. 1,2007. Primary Examiner-'Jimothy D Collins AS$i.sItitd Examiner-Monica Williams (74) Attorney, Agent. or Finn-QuickPatents. Inc.; Kevin Prinl:e . (51) IDt.CI. AOTK 29100 (2006.01) (57) (52) U.s. CL ............. _....................................... 119n07 (58) Field of Cla..ifu:atJon Sean:h .... ............. 11 91702. 119n07, 708, 709; 446/227,236,242 See application file for complete search,history. Rererene~ Clted (56) U;S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 2,307,905 A 2..567,600 A 2,673,087 A 2,750,189' A 2,8330244 .A 3,097.()i!6 A 3,112,109 A A cat toy for resting ona flat surface is disclosed. The c.at toy includes a cin:ular shaped housing that contains a motor connected to a power source. A resilient mOuse wand is secured at one end thereof with a motor shaft through a gea:ringarrangement, thrust bearing arrangement, or the like. The mouse wand includes a ball and a tail section at a distal end. A flex.ible IiQ~r partially covers the mOURe waDd such thatthecatcanseetheballmovillgundertheeov~andthetail 1/1943 AnleIIt 9/1951 ABSTRACT gection protrudiQ.g from the edge .of the cover. A control circujt is electronically coDIlflCted between the motor and the power solUte that causes the motor to change4irections and operate at different speeds and erraticlty. ('1\\Issa 311954 Bacon 6/1956 Huth 5/1958 BohIn)aD 7/1963 FdteIJ 11/1963 Y0t1118 9 ('1atms, 4 Drawing Sheets 10~ A-I u.s. Patent Nov. 2, 2010 US 7,823,541 B2 Sheet 1 of4 10~ 120 FIG. 1 u.s. Patent Nov. 2,2010 US 7,823,541 B2 Sheet2.of4 -L L u.s. Patent Nov. 2,2010 US 7,823,541 B2 Sheet 3 of4 FIG. 3 55 FIG. 4 u.s. Patent Nov. 2,2010 Sbeet4of4 FIG. 5 .4 -.1 US 7,823,541 B2 us 7,823~541 B2 1 2 CAT TOY Other ~uch priQr art device~ are adapted to be secured to the Q tops of doors . r doorways using snap-on clips. Necessarily, the devices mounted On the tops of doors employ relatively long strings to dangle 1he objects so that they can be reached bycats on the gtoWld. It is known to use elastic $trings forthe devices mounted to the tops of doorway,. so as to increase the dynamic action of the dangled object. However it is not always desirable. to mount these typ~ of pet toys only on doors. Gooerally, doors are located only Where entry to or exit from a residence, room, closet, or the like, is required. Pet owners may find ii annoying to have to negQtiate around dangling strings and objects each time they use doors to which such devices are attached. Additionally, pet ownet:S may simply want to install such devices at places other than where doors are located. For example, an owner may enjoy watching his or her pet playwithsucll 8. toy, and a d09r may not he located ataplace that is convenient or comfortable fur the owner to do so. One simple cat toy utilizes a single linear spring wire having cat auractive bait fastened to one end thereof while the opposite end is hand held by 8 person and manipulated in a manner to tempt the cat to play with the toy bait. A device of this genel",tl nature is the subject matter of a U,s. Pat. No. D295,79.8, issued to BOelke on May 17, 1988: While such band held toys of that or similar nature are known and have prove:n fairly successful in attractingStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started