Calculate the NPV and IRR without mengation Inter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sion. Do riot round untermediate calculations, Round your answers to two decimal places NPV:5 IRR: How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? 1. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote posibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur 1. The environmental effects of not instigated would result in addtional cash flows. Therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a mitigation analysis mn. The environmental effects should be onored since the plant is fogal without mitigation IV. The environmental effects should be treated as a un cost and therefore nord V. If the blity mitigates for the environmental fact, the project is not acceptable. However, before the company chooses to do the project without mingiteds to mal sure that anycosts of will for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis 6. Should this project be undertaken L. The project should be undertaken only if thny do not mitigate for the arrental clients. However, they have to make sure that there on the analys properly to avoid wyll wilwid additional costs that might result from undertaking the project without concern for the environmental impacts 11. The project should be undertaken only under the mitigation assumption 111. The project should be undertaken since the IRR is positive under both the mitigation" and "ho mitigation assumption IV. The project should be undertaken since the NP s fotive under both the initiation and no mitigation assumption V. Even when ne mutigation is considered the project has a negative NIV, so it should not be underta con nc utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona, Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed, Because the firm has received a permit it would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $209 90 million, and the expected cash in would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in on, the annual inflows would be 575.40 million Unemployment in the area where the plant would be bril is high, and the plant would provide about so yood jobs. The risk adjusted Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in milions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered at 10.55. Negative values, any should be indicated by a mission. Do not rand intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the decimal places NOVS mion IRR Calculate the and without mation, Enter your answer for NPV in milion For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10:55. Negative values, if should be indicated by a sin. Do not round intermediate calculations and your awers to the decimal places NPVS milion TRA How should the environmental effects be dealt with when eving this project The environmental affects should be treated as a remote posibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually 11. The environmental effects it not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, wice the plant is legal without mingition, there are benefits to performing a no mination analysis IL The environmental efects should be ignored since the plant is logal without mitigation IV. The environmental effects should be treated as a su cost and therefore gored V. If the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. However before the company choose to do the act without mitigation, it needs to make sure that anycosts of all will for not mtigting for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis Shad this undertaken? Calculate the NPV and IRR without mengation Inter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sion. Do riot round untermediate calculations, Round your answers to two decimal places NPV:5 IRR: How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? 1. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote posibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur 1. The environmental effects of not instigated would result in addtional cash flows. Therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a mitigation analysis mn. The environmental effects should be onored since the plant is fogal without mitigation IV. The environmental effects should be treated as a un cost and therefore nord V. If the blity mitigates for the environmental fact, the project is not acceptable. However, before the company chooses to do the project without mingiteds to mal sure that anycosts of will for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis 6. Should this project be undertaken L. The project should be undertaken only if thny do not mitigate for the arrental clients. However, they have to make sure that there on the analys properly to avoid wyll wilwid additional costs that might result from undertaking the project without concern for the environmental impacts 11. The project should be undertaken only under the mitigation assumption 111. The project should be undertaken since the IRR is positive under both the mitigation" and "ho mitigation assumption IV. The project should be undertaken since the NP s fotive under both the initiation and no mitigation assumption V. Even when ne mutigation is considered the project has a negative NIV, so it should not be underta con nc utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona, Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed, Because the firm has received a permit it would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $209 90 million, and the expected cash in would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in on, the annual inflows would be 575.40 million Unemployment in the area where the plant would be bril is high, and the plant would provide about so yood jobs. The risk adjusted Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in milions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered at 10.55. Negative values, any should be indicated by a mission. Do not rand intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the decimal places NOVS mion IRR Calculate the and without mation, Enter your answer for NPV in milion For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10:55. Negative values, if should be indicated by a sin. Do not round intermediate calculations and your awers to the decimal places NPVS milion TRA How should the environmental effects be dealt with when eving this project The environmental affects should be treated as a remote posibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually 11. The environmental effects it not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, wice the plant is legal without mingition, there are benefits to performing a no mination analysis IL The environmental efects should be ignored since the plant is logal without mitigation IV. The environmental effects should be treated as a su cost and therefore gored V. If the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. However before the company choose to do the act without mitigation, it needs to make sure that anycosts of all will for not mtigting for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis Shad this undertaken