Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Can please have an answer for part 1 and 4. Thanks a lot! Case 14-04 Spartan Casino On January 1, 2009, Spartan Casino (Spartan or

Can please have an answer for part 1 and 4. Thanks a lot!image text in transcribed

Case 14-04 Spartan Casino On January 1, 2009, Spartan Casino (Spartan or the \"Company\") executed a $250 million revolving credit facility with Uber Bank AG (Uber). The rate of interest on the credit facility is USD LIBOR + 650 basis points (bps) for the first two years. Spartan has a choice of 1M-, 3M-, and 6M-USD LIBOR each time it draws down on the credit facility. Interest payments on the borrowing are settled on the basis of the LIBOR tenor selected (e.g., if Spartan selects three-month USD LIBOR as the referenced rate, interest is due every three months on that borrowing). Principal borrowed is typically due five years from the drawdown date, but each drawdown will contain a specified maturity date. Upon finalizing the terms of the credit facility, Spartan immediately drew down $50 million on January 1, 2009, at 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps, due on December 31, 2013. Spartan's interest rate risk management policy requires that at least 75 percent of its outstanding debt be fixed rate (either directly or indirectly through the use of derivatives). In order to maintain compliance with its policy, Spartan entered into an interest rate swap to \"convert\" the borrowing from variable to fixed interest. The Company designated the interest rate swap as a hedge of forecasted interested payments associated with changes in 3M-USD-LIBOR on the first previously unhedged $50 million of 3M-USD-LIBOR based debt. The Company has no other debt. Specifically, Spartan executed the following interest rate swap transaction: Interest Rate Swap 1: Notional amount: $50 million Trade date: January 1, 2009 Effective date: January 1, 2009 Maturity date: December 31, 2013 Pay leg: 8.0 percent Receive leg: 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps Initial LIBOR: 1.00 percent Payment dates: Each March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 Variable reset dates: Quarterly, each March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 Six months later, on July 1, 2009, Spartan needed to again raise capital to continue construction on its new City Focus hotel and high-end retail development. The Company borrowed another $75 million at 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps, due on JuneSimilar to the first drawdown, Spartan executed a second interest rate swap with the following terms: Interest Rate Swap 2: Notional amount: $75 million Trade date: July 1, 2009 Effective date: July 1, 2009 Maturity date: June 30, 2014 Pay leg: 8.5 percent Receive leg: 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps Initial LIBOR: 1.25 percent Payment dates: Each September 30, December 31, March 31, and June 30 Variable reset dates: Quarterly, each September 30, December 31, March 31, and June 30 Spartan designated this interest rate swap as a hedge of forecasted interested payments associated with changes in 3M-USD-LIBOR on the first previously unhedged $75 million of 3M-USD-LIBOR based debt. 30, 2014. After two years, Spartan continues to pay interest on the $125 million borrowings on time, in addition to settling the interest rate swap each quarter. However, on December 31, 2010, Spartan decides to pay $25 million of the $125 million it has borrowed from Uber to date. The debt is prepayable without penalty. The Company makes no other changes to its capital structure of derivatives. Required: 1. Define the type of hedge that Spartan would need to designate. In other words, are these cash flow hedges, fair value hedges, or net investment hedges? 2. Identify the criteria that Spartan would need to meet and document to ensure the interest rate swaps achieve hedge accounting that is based on the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities. 3. Determine the appropriate journal entries to account for the two hedging relationships for the year ended December 31, 2009. Use the details below to aid in entry determination, and assume that both hedging relationships are perfectly effective. March 31, 2009 1.00% (reset 12/31) $250,000 n/a June 30, 2009 1.10% (reset 03/31) $750,000 n/a September 30, 2009 1.25% (reset 06/30) $1,200,000 $900,000 December 31, 2009 1.18% (reset 09/30) $1,100,000 $775,000 * Note that the fair values are after the quarterly settlements are made. 4. Briefly describe the implications of Spartan paying down $25 million of the $125 million total borrowing on the two hedging relationships

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Fundamental Accounting Principles Volume II

Authors: Kermit Larson, Tilly Jensen, Heidi Dieckmann

16th Canadian edition

1259261433, 978-1260305838

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

=+a) Is this an observational or experimental study?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Subjective norms, i.e. the norms of the target group

Answered: 1 week ago