Can the vice president of operations for meat-packaging facility have the sufficient mens rea to be held liable for manslaughter if he refused to attend meetings related to the hazardous conditions in the plant that lead to worker deaths because he feared he would be criminally responsible once he hears the information that was going to be presented in the meetings?

Group of answer choices

a. Yes, under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

b. No, you never have to prove mens rea to hold someone criminally responsible.

c. No, actual knowledge of criminal activity is required for all corporate crimes.

d. Yes, under the doctrine of conscious avoidance.