can u do it anither way as someone has same answer as you posted before on chegg.
i do not want same
i will be thankfull ti u if u do it another way or change it like by adding more or by other things
busineas law
https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2007/2007scc24/2007scc24.html
Answer the following question regarding the case 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother, 2005 BCCA 384 (Canll): "Explain the nature of the complaint and the appropriate remedy in these circumstances. Should the innocent partners also be liable for the loss?" Answer 1 of 1 In this case the lawyer has failed to advice Monarch correctly and completely on all matter relevant to the continuing his business and instead concealed fact which has been used for personal advantage. Therefore the nature of the complaining here the Breach of Fiduciary Duty which the lawyer had towards Monarch being his legal adviser accountable for his advice and job. The appropriate remedy as identified in this situation would be that the lawyer who breached his duty as well as the implied trust will be required to compensate Monarch out of his personal profit which he gained directly from the business out of concealing the truth and acting a competitor if monarch. He will also be required to pay monarch back out of his earnings from law firm which he gained from billing monarch for the services, but only for the time period within which the lawyer was acting as the partner of firm and business competitor of monarch. Once he will resign from the law firm he will have no duty towards monarch. No the innocent partners who did not had any idea about this deceitful act of lawyer would not be liable for the loss of monarch. This is because they did not had any knowledge about lawyer's attempt to take a personal advantage for not revealing correct information to his client monarch. Thanks dear student.. Hope this helps.. Good luck... Rate if satisfied :) Answer the following question regarding the case 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother, 2005 BCCA 384 (Canti: "Explain the nature of the complaint and the appropriate remedy in these circumstances. Should the innocent partners atso be liable for the loss?" Answer the following question regarding the case 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother, 2005 BCCA 384 (Canll): "Explain the nature of the complaint and the appropriate remedy in these circumstances. Should the innocent partners also be liable for the loss?" Answer 1 of 1 In this case the lawyer has failed to advice Monarch correctly and completely on all matter relevant to the continuing his business and instead concealed fact which has been used for personal advantage. Therefore the nature of the complaining here the Breach of Fiduciary Duty which the lawyer had towards Monarch being his legal adviser accountable for his advice and job. The appropriate remedy as identified in this situation would be that the lawyer who breached his duty as well as the implied trust will be required to compensate Monarch out of his personal profit which he gained directly from the business out of concealing the truth and acting a competitor if monarch. He will also be required to pay monarch back out of his earnings from law firm which he gained from billing monarch for the services, but only for the time period within which the lawyer was acting as the partner of firm and business competitor of monarch. Once he will resign from the law firm he will have no duty towards monarch. No the innocent partners who did not had any idea about this deceitful act of lawyer would not be liable for the loss of monarch. This is because they did not had any knowledge about lawyer's attempt to take a personal advantage for not revealing correct information to his client monarch. Thanks dear student.. Hope this helps.. Good luck... Rate if satisfied :) Answer the following question regarding the case 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother, 2005 BCCA 384 (Canti: "Explain the nature of the complaint and the appropriate remedy in these circumstances. Should the innocent partners atso be liable for the loss
