Can you expand this discussion post: After watching the Mock Trial Video, I certainly believe that the plaintiff, Marilyn Adams, was unlawfully harassed. She received inappropriate gifts, such as lingerie and notes, and faced many unwanted advances from a co-worker. Additionally, she experienced unwelcome attention and catcalls from several employees in the shipping department. This behavior created a hostile work environment, especially since she had to walk through the shipping department at least twice a day, making the situation unbearable. 2. Is the Defendant liable for the harassment? Why or why not? I think that the defendant, Tetris Computer, is liable for the harassment because the company's sexual harassment policy allowed Ms. Adams to report incidents to her supervisor or HR. Despite having a zero-tolerance policy for sexual harassment, the company failed to act promptly. Mr. Johnson from HR confirmed that the allegations were true and severe, leading to the coworker's termination and consequences for the shipping department. However, Ms. Adams endured at least three weeks of harassment after reporting it to her supervisor three times. The supervisor, as an employee, should have escalated the issue to HR or taken more decisive action, given the company's policy and commitment to prompt remedial action. 3. If you answered yes to the first two questions, what amount of damages, if any, is Plaintiff entitled to as a result of being subjected to unlawful harassment? Si