can you help me re-wordddd this:

David's case has had a profound impact on my views regarding the nature vs. nurture debate. While I have always acknowledged the intricate interplay between innate traits and environmental factors in shaping human behavior, David's case leans heavily toward the nurture side. The sudden and extreme shift in his behavior following exposure to carbaryl underscores the immense power of external influences in overriding one's inherent disposition. It challenges the notion of fixed, innate characteristics as the sole determinants of behavior. Instead, this case highlights the malleability of human behavior in response to significant environmental stimuli. While nature undoubtedly contributes to an individual's baseline tendencies, David's case demonstrates that nurture can play a pivotal role in triggering profound and uncharacteristic behavioral changes, encouraging a more balanced perspective on this enduring debate.