Can you help me with this problem? Thank you

Suppose we have the followig payoff matrix for a oomplementary investment game. The number in the lower left comer is the payoff to Wild and Crazy Guys (Guys). The other number is the payoff to Blues Brothers (Blues Bros). Is there a dominant strategy for either player? The dominant strategy for Blues Bros. 7 and the dominant strategy for Guys 7 . What is the Nash equilibrium? O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Blues Bros. to invest and Guys to not invest. O B. This game has no Nash equilibria. O C. The Nash equilibrium is for Blues Bros. to not invest and Guys to invest. O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Blues Bros. and Guys to not invest. O E. The Nash equilibrium is for Blues Bros. and Guys to invest. What is the maximin solution? The maximin solution is for Blues Bros. to W and for Guys to 7 . How would the reputation of Blues Bros. affect the likely outcome? 0 A. Guys could use a maximin strategy. 0 B. Guys and Blues Bros. could form a joint venture. O c. Guys could impose a penalty on Blues Bros. if they do not invest. Don't invest Guys Invest Don't invest Invest Ink AL Q . q '3' l