Can you please answer question 1 and 2.

Thank you!

Professional skepticism is at the core of ultimately performing a quality audit. Below is a scenario that represents a situation that any auditor can encounter when conducting an audit. I was a senior working on a public company audit engagement. As part of our risk assessment, we evaluated the compensation and performance management process of a selection of key employees. I made selections of employees from many different sectors of the business and evaluated their compensation components, goals for the year, and recent performance evaluations. I was looking for any indicators that might lead to personal bias or a risk of material misstatement (including those resulting from fraud) that we had not previously identified. When I reviewed the documentation for the tax manager responsible for leading the tax accounting group (specifically focused on bookkeeping the company's tax transactions), as well as reviewing the company's tax provision and calculation of the effective tax rate, I noticed that one of her goals for the year was to reduce the effective tax rate by an overly aggressive percentage from the prior year. In addition, the company's compensation and bonus structure was tied to whether employees met their goals for the year. Part 1 Requirements: 1. Identify red flags in the above scenario that should heighten the auditor's professional skepticism. 2. Assume you are the above auditor. Discuss what next steps you would take when applying the appropriate level of professional skepticism. (Be specific what you would do next if you encounter a similar situation in practice.)